From the moment I'm introduced to Ensemble Studios' Bruce Shelley, I can tell my bumbling, "Is that pinata gay?" style of gaming journalism just isn't going to fly. A gruff but pleasant bear of a man, he carries upon his broad shoulders the impenetrable gravitas of a Kentucky tobacconist, or a man who feels very passionately about bottle caps, or any other aficionado of a passion the appeal of which completely eludes me.
In this case, that passion is RTS games. The game he's about to show me in Leipzig? Age of Empires 3: The Warchiefs, the upcoming expansion pack to the critically-acclaimed but, by me, completely ignored RTS title Age of Empires 3. I don't know anything about Warchiefs. And I don't really know anything about the Age of Empires series except that I can't stand the entire genre.
"I don't really know how familiar you are with my games," Shelley says to me as he loads up The Warchiefs on his laptop.
"Um...." I stall, looking to be politic. "Just a little, really. I'm not a big RTS gamer. Frankly, I find them unplayable."
The room goes quiet. Shelley just stares at me, his face an emotionless pall. Michael Wolf, Microsoft's Games for Windows dude, begins to visibly twitch in social discomfort. Panicking, I ramble on:
"I mean, the flesh is willing. God it's willing! But the jelly of the mind is weak, Bruce. it's so weak..." I shake my head back and forth while googling my eyes around, to emphasize the fact that, as a fetus, my capacity for RTS appreciation was permanently crippled by the high vodka proof of the fluid in my mother's amniotic sack.
"I often think that I would really love the genre if someone... Logitech maybe... came out with some sort of cyberoptic cable that I could just insert into the jelly of my eye and that would directly interface with my brain. Because that's the only way I'm ever going to be able to play one of these games, Bruce. With current technology, it's just a constant exercise in fighting the interface for me."
The silence is interrupted only by the sound of my arrhythmic heart pounding in nervousness through my sunken chest. Did I really just start-off a one-on-one session with one of RTS gaming's design gods that I hated his games? After he'd rushed back from an autograph session to pander to me, a mere doofus? My bladder surges in nervousness.
Finally, Shelley emits a ponderous sigh.
"Well, you know, we try to make our games keeping guys like you in mind," Bruce kindly says. "In our single player games, you can pause anytime to get your bearings and issue orders. A lot of guys didn't want that feature at Ensemble, but I made them put it in. So it's almost turn-based. We try to make them as accessible as possible to as many players as possible."
Silence again. I have no idea what to say. Everyone in the room is conscious of the fact that I'm an idiot. I am relieved when a stern looking German girl in a Microsoft t-shirt comes into the room; she sternly commands me to have a Diet Coke.
"I don't want a Diet Coke," I respond.
She seems outraged. "What? You don't want a Diet Coke? But you're American!" It's as if I just told her I didn't breathe oxygen.
"Irish, actually. A regular Coke would be fine."
The fury of her eyes clears to a Euro-conspiriatorial glimmer. "Ah, yes! That explains it!" she says, gives the rest of the room a deeply distrustful look, then wanders out of the room to get me a Coke.
(Later on, this same dollsome serving wench will confess to me over a steam tray of goulash that "These Americans will order an entire hog for lunch, but then wash it down only with a Diet Coke." The food service at Microsoft's GC06 booth is apparently an incredible cultural conflict for all involved; Microsoft's Michael Wolf will later admit to me that for the first few days of the conference, the German hostesses who had been hired to serve them completely denied access to any Americans attempting to enter the booth's kitchen, and that these same Germans' incessant efforts to bring Diet Cokes to the Americans in the various show rooms was a mysterious recent development about which all Microsoft employees had become deeply suspicious.)
"Anyway, let's show you Warchiefs..." Shelley continues. He boots up the program: I see an opening screen with some attractive polygonal Indians dancing around a fire. There's also some teepees. I write "teepees" down in my notebook.
"Okay, so in this expansion, there's three new Native-American tribes you can play as. You can play as the Iroquois, the Sioux, and the Aztecs... they are good at economics."
"What was the middle one again?" I ask.
"The Sioux."
"How do you spell that?"
"Ess. Eye. Oh. You. Ex. They're very famous," Shelley explains.
I immediately feel like an idiot. "Ohhhh... the Sioux," I say weakly. "You know what it is? It's one of those words I'm always reading but never hear pronounced." Like phallus, I think, but I can't use that example, because I don't know how to pronounce it.
Shelley kindly passes over the non-sequitur, while I write Sioux down in my notebook, put a few exclamation points next to it, then triple underline it. I fumble in my mind for a question to ask that does not betray me as a gibbering fool. Finally, I happen upon one.
"Let me ask you a question. Obviously, when you're dealing with a game in which you take actual races and cultures than then start giving them character traits, bonuses and weaknesses, the spectre of political correctness is going to raise its head. How do you work around that?"
Shelley goes contemplative, "Well, Microsoft has a team that makes sure that nothing we do is going to offend anyone. But we sometimes run into problems. For example, in one of our games, we had the China Sea. Except the Koreans don't like that, so we had to call it the East Sea. But for the Japanese, it's the Sea of Japan. So for each of these countries, we had to have a different localization."
I find this aspect of game design absolutely fascinating, and want to ask him follow-up questions like So would you be prevented from making, say, the Jews in a game good with economics by Microsoft's sensitivity department? but Shelley is already fiddling around with stuff on screen. I decide I should pay better attention.
But my eyes immediately glaze over. The game is absolutely beautiful looking, full of neat little flourishes and technologies, but none of that can change the fact that I am watching someone play a game which, by its very genre, I will never be able to enjoy.
The test map is set in a beautiful, impressionistic painted desert, glowing with violet and peach hues. Shelley starts showing me cool things, one following another in rapid staccato succession. Under the watchful eyes of any old RTS hand, or someone with a genuine enthusiasm for the Age of Empires series, these moments would be reacted to with deeply rooted observational understanding, peals of delight. But to me? My only response is pedestrian word flatulence.
Bruce Shelley shows me...
Warchief's Treaty Mode, in which the players agree for the first twenty minutes of a multiplayer match to be a time of peace, where warring on the other side is not possible. My earnest response: "That seems useful!"
How the Indians Can Get Ninja Units. "The Native Americans had ninjas? Huh."
A really cool Civil War era ironclad boat. "My great great grandpa helped build one of those!"
The petards, which are bomb carrying demo men. "Hoisted, if you will!" Everyone looks embarrassed.
The new saloon structure, where a player can recruit mercenaries, such as pirates. "And zombies, I hope!"
The European Civs' new 'Revolution' option, which turns all citizens into militia but does not allow them to gather resources anymore. "Didn't that happen in the Revolutionary War?"
A Native American War Chief, which is sort of a hero unit that lends bonuses to all units around it. While Shelley is playing with it, it gets shot and lies writhing on the ground. Shelley tells me that the cry it makes literally translates to, "Every moment I live is agony!" "Wow! Just like Sartre!"
And so it goes. After awhile, Shelley pretty much forgets that I'm even in the room, which is a big relief. I start twiddling my thumbs and watching him play, occasionally writing down observations of importance in my notebook. "Big blue thing" one such note informs me. "Europeans have Native American embassy as a building," another more helpfully describes.
But I'm not into it. And at this point, Shelley isn't even pretending to be demonstrating the game to me — he's just sitting there, a big smile beaming on his face, playing the game he's created with genuine fondness.
For a while, I sit there in his presence, honestly charmed. That one man can have such childlike passion for his own games fills me with the feeling that all is right in the world.
But after awhile, I begin to twitch, grow uncomfortable. Exactly how long am I supposed to sit here, watching him play his game? I've already been there forty minutes, yet he shows no sign of calling an end to the session, or excusing himself for another interview. Am I supposed to sit there for forty minutes? Fifty? An hour? Will I simply wither away, my only moisture supplied by an incessant German-supplied IV drip of Diet Coke? What is the expectation here? I'm not a games journalist. I'm just a fucking blogger. Do these sessions just roll on interminably until one or the other of you passes out? Bruce! For the love of god! STOP PLAYING YOUR GAME ALREADY!
"Ummmmm..." I eventually hazard. "Looks great! But I think I've seen enough." For a brief second, I worry that he might burst into tears. But Shelley sighs, apparently in relief: it's what he's been waiting for since the second I walked in the door.
"Oh, okay! Great! Well, thanks for stopping by!" And with that, he folds my tiny hand into his own gigantic mitt, like a bear cradling a fragile little bird.
But if you like RTSes, which I don't, Age of Empires 3: The Warchiefs looks totally great.









Comments
Great writeup once again. I actually love RTSes and Age of Empires is one of my favourite series so I'll definitely get this.
That War Chief's Treaty Mode looks interesting, specially if you constantly get beaten by rushers.
And Florian, what is it with you that you find RTses so difficult to handle? I mean, I understand if we were talking about Korean Pro-gamer reaction speeds and such, but simple single player RTSing isn't all that difficult imho. By not playing some of these games you're definitely missing out.
He sure looks cranky.
You were the wrong guy for this assignment. Personally, I love RTSes. Having a journalist do a preview of a game that he hates because of it's genre is just going to make Bruce Shelley uncomfortable with ever dealing with Kotaku again. "They hate what I do." is the impression you left behind.
... not sure if one can call that journalism, but it's entertaining and somewhat informative. I'm just a bit puzzled about the revolting action, you don't usually revolt to fight agains another country...
Florian, the word is hoised. Hoisted is an intransitive form.
A flag can be hoisted into the air, but one must be hoised by one's own petard.
That's crazy informative, and I didn't know that. Still. IT"S NOT WHAT I SAID!
I actually laughed out loud. Funny stuff.
While it would obviously be better if Kotaku was able to send someone that likes RTSs to this interview, things don't often work out that way in the real world. It's not like Kotaku has more than four staffers.
This "he doesn't like the genre" thing is something you see thrown at reviews a lot, as if every magazine has thousands of people that love each and every genre so they can optimally review everything. But, the reality is, it just doesn't work that way - magazine sales don't justify larger staffs, and magazine readers like "knowing" the reviewers' and their tastes, which legions of genre-specific freelancers works against.
While I'm sure this situation could've been handled more tactfully, the reality is that niche-entrenched developers like Bruce Shelley need to hear this sort of REALITY more often. The games industry isn't going to evolve and grow if we keep servicing the same people over and over, especially as development costs continue to skyrocket.
Also, in closing, I would like to say: New Games Journalism FTL.
Uh, I think would only be "hoised" if it were still 1602...
No apologies required, Florian.
He should have spent some time asking for more details about what you abhor about RTS games so much.
Besides mechanics, I just don't find the concept amusing. Except for Aliens vs Predator: Extinction, anyway. Hearing those marines scream like little bitches as the Queen kicks their ass is awesome. LOL
one would think bruce would want to try to show you how you might like this game even though its a genre you dont really get into. i did enjoy the article though. and really florian is not a journalist but a blogger, so dont expect super in depth stuff coming out of his opinion-spitting finger tips.
i liked Age2 alot for its multiplayer but never got into ANY rts's single player mode as i too am not very comfortable with rts interfaces nor do i know all of the keyboard shortcuts. while most people i play against pwn me horribly in the first 15 minutes or so, i do get enjoyment from playing. the new treaty mode would be my friend.
It's hoised now, it wasn't hoised in 1602. It has not ever been hoisted.
Shakespeare's then current past-participle form of hoise was hoist, which is what he used.
'Hoise' has become hoist since then. The current proper past-participle of 'hoist' is generally 'hoisted', but the use of 'hoisted' as the past-participle causes the sense of the verb to become intransitive (does not take a direct object). Thus, hoised (a past-participle form which remains in the transitive sense).
Shakesepeare ftw!
J. Goodwin - was that bowl of Kellogg's Pedantic Flakes delicious this morning?
Welcome to professional journalism. You have to ask people for information, but girl go with an open mind! if you don't like something which will be the main subject, try to interview not for you but for people that might be interested in reading about it, don't put a mind barrier just because you don't like it.
That's the problem is the internet press (bloggers) all they do is copy-and-paste the news, so when the opportunity to interview someone, most come up short or end up being major asskissing.
<3
i thought it was an immature article and unprofessional handling of the interview. sorry.
i hate sports games, but if i was reporting on one, i'd at least try to act interested... right? it's out of respect to the person being interviewed as well as to your readers.
I think Florian tried to act interested... and failed absolutely miserably.
Wow, I am surprised at the comments! I have found Florian's coverage of this entire event to be of the highest quality. I enjoy reading Kotaku because it offers insights and opinions not found on other popular gaming sites I have read. Were I interested purely in reviews and previews, I would probably not spend time here. Thank you for your excellent coverage of GC06 and for offering us a colorful narrative of what it was like to be there.
Yeah, Florian and I often don't see eye-to-eye, but I think this story and the Viva Pinata's piece were wonderful. Sure it didn't tell you much about the game, but it was a nice cultural piece and when taken as such, it was a fun read.
PS. click on my name before the says... snazzy.
my old roomie played rts games....all day....all night...i hate "rts"s, i hate horns blowing to tell you some one is attacking you, i hate people talking in languages i don't know without subtitles and never knowing what was truly said, if that guy was half a decent game designer the fact that you as a uninterested gamer were in front of him as an interviewer should have got him to jump at the chance to pick at your brain, not just play his own game like an anti-social ass (that's just the way my roomate was too... he was an accountant...yes sir real party animal that one!!)
Wow, a typical Florian article. Like journalism, only not.
Dead on with the "fat americans and their diet cokes" observation, but as an RTS fan i must also call for your head for this non-chalant article about the game. "But if you like RTSes, which I don't, Age of Empires 3: War Chiefs looks totally great." And you would know because?
Because it looked pretty and had cool units and Bruce was having a lot of fun and it just LOOKED like fun, if you enjoy the genre's central conceit. Which I don't.
Well it looks like he found it humorous: http://ageofempires3.com/DevelopersBlog/Default.aspx?blogg...
Start a discussion:
Login with your username and password below. Or comment on this post via email.
Forgot your username or password? New User?